

| The VMRG has made a detailed submission (July 4, 2006) opposing the location of the Long Term Containment Facility at Nowingi. The submission was prepared by Ann Stokie, Secretary of the VMRG, and Dr Joe Benshemesh, Consultant and author of the National Recovery Plan for Malleefowl. Click here to view a precis of the Powerpoint presentation, encapsulating the essence of the submission The submission was to the Independent Planning Panel for the Nowingi Long Term Containment Facility. The Panel received submissions from numerous experts and interest groups and their report is due in early December. |
|
Our Secretary has been following developments quite closely and reports on developments to date. CLICK HERE to view her report in full. |
|
The VMRG has recently received correspondence from Environment Australia. In essence, efforts to have the proposed facility at Nowingi declared a 'controlled action' have proven successful. The covering letter outlines the rationale for the decision and acknowledges the input of the VMRG into the decision making process. A copy of the decision itself was attached. Both make for interesting reading. CLICK HERE to read the documents in full. |
|
CLICK HERE to view the VMRG Response to the ENVIRONMENT EFFECTS STATEMENT DRAFT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES |
CLICK HERE to view the VMRG Submission to the DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND HERITAGE arguing for a declaration of a 'controlled action', under the Environment Protection and Diodiversity Act |
CLICK HERE to access "Fact Sheet 5" and the 100+ page "Issues and Options for the Design and Operation of a Long-Term Containment Facility in Victoria" document, at the Major Projects Victoria website. The website includes the words "discussion paper" in the title but the actual cover uses the word "Report". Fact Sheet 5 is a summary of the Report. |

| Background to the VMRG Response |
| S P O T  T H E  D I F F E R E N C E  ? ? |
![]() |
![]() |
| These two photos were taken early in June of 2004 by the same photographer, on the same day only minutes apart, using the same camera. One was taken about 50 metres from an active Malleefowl nest in Hattah-Kulkuyne National Park. The mound is about 1.5 km east of the Calder Highway, directly opposite the site of the proposed toxic waste dump. The other was taken about 2 km westward of the other, i.e. 0.5 km west of the Calder Highway, in the proposed site. The environment is virtually identical.Much of the proposed site is typical mallee scrub, as pictured. It acts as a corridor between Hattah-Kulkyne NP and Sunset-Murray NP for malleefowl and other animals.The VMRG is primarily opposed to the establishment of the Toxic Waste Dump at Nowingi because it will mean further loss of habitat for the magnificent and endangered Malleefowl. The VMRG is firmly committed to the concept of biodiversity and, as a consequence, is also opposed to the site because it is home to a number of other rare and vulnerable species.READ ON | |
| The VMRG's defining document is the National Recovery Plan for Malleefowl.Joe Benshemesh, October 2000, ISBN 0759010072The document has been endorsed by Environment Australia. | |
The following statements can be found in the SUMMARY at the beginning of the document :-
|
Current taxon statusNationally, the Malleefowl is listed as vulnerable (Garnett 1992, ANZECC 1995, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999). .... 'threatened' (endangered) in Victoria (schedule 2 of the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988), ....Habitat requirements and limiting factors.The Malleefowl is found in semi-arid to arid shrublands and low woodlands, especially those dominated by mallee and/or acacias. A sandy substrate and abundance of leaf litter are required for breeding. Densities of the birds are generally greatest in areas of higher rainfall and on more fertile soils where habitats tend to be thicker and there is an abundance of food plants. Much of the best habitat for Malleefowl has already been cleared or has been modified by grazing by sheep, cattle, rabbits and goats. The species has been shown to be highly sensitive to grazing by sheep, and is probably similarly sensitive to grazing by other introduced herbivores. The effect of fire on Malleefowl is severe and breeding in burnt areas is usually reduced for at least 30 years. However, the deleterious effect of fire appears to be mitigated if fires burn patchily. Predation by the introduced fox is also thought to be limiting the abundance of Malleefowl and in many areas may be a major cause of decline. The degree of fragmentation of the remaining Malleefowl habitat is of particular concern and presents a major limiting factor to halting and reversing the decline of the species.(Web Manager's emphasis)A few paragraphs further on :-Biodiversity benefits.Malleefowl share their habitat with several threatened species, including the Black-eared Miner Manorina melanotis, Red- lored Whistler Pachycephala rufogularis, Mallee Emu-wren Stripiturus mallee, Striated Grasswren Amytornis striatus striatus, and Western Whipbird Psophodes nigrogularis oberon and P. n. leucogaster. These and other threatened species would also benefit from management actions that secure habitat; reduce grazing pressure, fox abundance, and the extent of fires; and increase the connectivity of habitat fragments. Some of these species might also benefit from the increased community participation, and the infrastructure used to monitor Malleefowl may also be useful to monitor the abundance of other species.
|
These statements are to be found in the RECOVERY ACTIONS section of the document :-
|
RECOVERY ACTIONS..... the highest priority objectives and actions are presented first with due regard to the severity of the threats addressed and the likely national benefits to Malleefowl conservation.(Web Manager's emphasis)Objective 1: Reduce permanent habitat lossAction 1.1 Retain areas that support Malleefowl, and those that support Malleefowl habitat, and protect them from clearing.(Web Manager's emphasis)JustificationClearing causes permanent loss of Malleefowl habitat and has been the major factor in the decline of Malleefowl in agricultural areas. Clearing often continues in a piecemeal fashion and is a concern in all States, especially in south-west New South Wales where substantial clearing is a possibility in the near future (Department of Land and Water Conservation 1997).MethodNative vegetation clearance controls exist in most states (see Appendix III) and often specifically protect habitats that harbour threatened species such as Malleefowl. However, sites that are important for Malleefowl will often need to be identified before they are protected under these initiatives (see Actions 8.1 and 10.1). Important sites for the conservation of Malleefowl include areas in which the species is resident and also those areas that form dispersal corridors between populations.(Web Manager's emphasis)
|
| CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT. | |
| General Locality Map | Detail Map |
| The large area to the west of the site is the Sunset Murray National Park. Note on the left hand map the corridor to the south linking it with the Hattah Kulkyne National Park. In fact, the corridor extends north along the western side of the Calder Highway through the site area, as can be seen on the right hand map. | ![]() |
![]() |
| Visit the Victoria Major Projects web site (Click Here) to view maps in larger format.At the site, click on the link to the 'Environment Effects Statement (EES)' (para 5), and then on the right hand pdf file. | |
| The process of preparing the Environment Effects Statement has begun.You can view draft guidelines by going to the Major Projects website (www.majorprojects.vic.gov.au/industrialwaste)and clicking on draft guidelines in the section beginningEnvironment Effects Statement - Draft Assessment Guidelines.The process in chart form, as printed on Page 10 of the document, can be accessed directly by clicking here. One of the Fact sheets contains a more user friendly version of the process chart.The four Fact sheets listed under the heading'Containment facility - Fact sheets' make for some interesting reading.In Fact sheet 1 and Fact sheet 4 it is stated"Initial flora and fauna surveys indicate that the study area is unlikely to contain critical habitat of rare or endangered flora or fauna."WRONGIn addition to containing important habitat for the malleefowl, the area also contains endangered buloke woodlands and is habitat for significant species such as the mallee emu wren, apostebird, striated grasswren, hooded robin, brown tree creeper, black-eared cuckoo, chesnut quail-thrush, Major Mitchell's cockatoo and red-backed kingfisher. |
| Make your views known to :- | ||
| The Hon. Steve BRACKS, MPPremierLevel 11 Treasury PlaceMelbourne  3002Phone 9651 5000Fax 9651 5054steve.bracks@minstaff.vic.gov.au | The Hon. John TWAITES, MPDeputy PremierMinister for EnvironmentLevel 11 Treasury PlaceMelbourne  3002Phone 9651 1222Fax 9651 1188john.thwaites@minstaff.vic.gov.au | The Hon. Peter BATCHELOR, MPMinister for Major ProjectsLevel 26, Nauru House80 Collins StreetMelbourne  3000Phone 9655 8683Fax 9655 8617peter.batchelor@minstaff.vic.gov.au |
| Feel free to get in touch to find out more about the VMRG position and/or to add your support to the cause.Contact the Secretary on 5229 8648 or use the email address on the bottom of the Home Page.You may even wish to join the VMRG - use the Volunteers, VMRG and Members buttons above to find out more about the work of the VMRG. |
| Visit the websites of some of the other key environmental groups | ||
| Threatened Species Network | Birds Australia | VNPAVictorian National Parks Association |